The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: A pluralogue. Part 4: General conclusion

23Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the conclusion to this multi-part article I first review the discussions carried out around the six essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis - the position taken by Allen Frances on each question, the commentaries on the respective question along with Frances' responses to the commentaries, and my own view of the multiple discussions. In this review I emphasize that the core question is the first - what is the nature of psychiatric illness - and that in some manner all further questions follow from the first. Following this review I attempt to move the discussion forward, addressing the first question from the perspectives of natural kind analysis and complexity analysis. This reflection leads toward a view of psychiatric disorders - and future nosologies - as far more complex and uncertain than we have imagined. © 2012 Phillips et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phillips, J., Frances, A., Cerullo, M. A., Chardavoyne, J., Decker, H. S., First, M. B., … Zachar, P. (2012, December 18). The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: A pluralogue. Part 4: General conclusion. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-7-14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free