Blockade of anxiolytic-like actions of chlordiazepoxide by naloxone in the elevated plus-maze: Comparisons between Swiss, C57BL/6, and BALB/c mice

18Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ability of the opiate antagonist naloxone to block the anxiolytic- like effects of chlordiazepoxide in the elevated plus-maze was evaluated in Swiss, C57BL/6, and BALB/c mice. In our version of this procedure, a dose of 5 mg/kg of chlordiazepoxide was necessary in all three strains to increase the proportion of open-arms entries, the parameter supposed to best represent anxiolytic activity. No significant effect was obtained on closed-arms entries, suggesting that the anxiolytic-like effect observed was not a consequence of locomotor stimulation. However, in the BALB/c mice, there was a nonsignificant tendency for an increase of closed-arms entries. When chlordiazepoxide, 5 mg/kg, was combined with naloxone, 10 mg/kg, the effects of the benzodiazepine were blocked in the Swiss and C57BL/6 strains but not in the BALB/c strain. If anything, naloxone seemed to enhance the actions of chlordiazepoxide in this strain, but this effect failed to reach statistical significance. The antagonism by naloxone of the anxiolytic-like effects of chlordiazepoxide in the Swiss and C57BL/6 strains coincides with previous results obtained in the rat and in the light/dark choice test and the free exploratory paradigm in mice. The lack of antagonism in the BALB/c strain also coincides with previous results from these procedures. It is suggested that the opioid system is not important for the anxiolytic-like actions of benzodiazepines in BALB/c mice. This may be due to no or small release of opioids in response to stress in this strain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ågmo, A., Belzung, C., Deloire, X., Grassin, M., & Lewis, S. (1999). Blockade of anxiolytic-like actions of chlordiazepoxide by naloxone in the elevated plus-maze: Comparisons between Swiss, C57BL/6, and BALB/c mice. Psychobiology, 27(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03332104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free