Evaluation of Nutrition Assessment Tools Compared With Body Cell Mass for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease

50Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: We compared the subjective global assessment (SGA) and a range of SGA-based assessment tools with body cell mass (BCM) in patients with stage IV and V predialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). Study Design: This was a cross-sectional, observational study. Setting: The study took place at a public tertiary hospital predialysis outpatient clinic. Patients: A total of 56 consecutive consenting patients with CKD (61% were male; age [mean ± standard deviation] 70.2 ± 11.6 years; glomerular filtration rate 22.2 ± 6.8 mL/min). Main Outcome Measure: Nutrition status was the main outcome measure. Results: In this population, the prevalence of malnutrition was 19.6% (n = 11, SGA B; no C ratings). Malnutrition was associated with lower BCM (mean BCM, 26.3 vs. 33.4 kg, P = .007, measured by total body potassium), body weight (64.8 vs. 76.1 kg, P = .042), body mass index (23.7 vs. 27.6 kg/m2, P = .015), and greater weight loss over the previous 6 months (-6.2 vs. -0.1 kg, P = .004). BCM had a weak relationship with 7-point SGA (P = .267), malnutrition inflammation score (r = -0.27 P = .063), and patient-generated SGA (r = -0.27 P = .060). There was no association for either measure of nutrition status (SGA or BCM) with albumin, glomerular filtration rate, or C-reactive protein. Conclusion: SGA in its original form most accurately delineated malnutrition by depleted BCM and is the most appropriate tool for cross-sectional assessment of nutrition status in patients with predialysis CKD. © 2007 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campbell, K. L., Ash, S., Bauer, J. D., & Davies, P. S. W. (2007). Evaluation of Nutrition Assessment Tools Compared With Body Cell Mass for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease. Journal of Renal Nutrition, 17(3), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2006.12.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free