Barriers on establishing passive strategies in office spaces: A case study in a historic university building

2Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The adaptation of spaces to different usage typologies can be complex in heritage buildings. Facilities were initially planned for a specific type of use that, when changed, require additional measures to ensure a suitable indoor environment. Passive strategies—e.g., free cooling—are commonly used as an alternative without requiring equipment installation. However, its implementation often leads to unsatisfactory conditions. Therefore, it is important to clarify the main barriers to achieving thermal comfort in readapted historic buildings. The present work investigates the thermal comfort conditions reported by workers in office spaces of a historic building in the University of Coimbra. A monitoring campaign was carried out between May and September 2020 to assess indoor conditions’ quality. Due to the current pandemic of COVID‐19, offices were not occupied at full capacity. A one‐day evaluation of thermal comfort was made using a climate analyzer and six occupants were surveyed on 19 August 2020. The main results highlighted discomfort due to overheating of spaces. The causes were related to the combination of inadequate implementation of the free cooling actions and the building use. Furthermore, it was recommended the installation of HVAC systems in case of full capacity.

References Powered by Scopus

Adaptive thermal comfort: Principles and practice

585Citations
560Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

163Citations
429Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saraiva, N. B., Pereira, L. D., Gaspar, A. R., & da Costa, J. J. (2021). Barriers on establishing passive strategies in office spaces: A case study in a historic university building. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084563

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 5

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

20%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

38%

Arts and Humanities 4

31%

Social Sciences 2

15%

Psychology 2

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 28

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free