Position statement in RFID S&P panel: From relative security to perceived secure

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

RFID is now in fashion. Exactly 20 years ago it was pointed out that identification based on electronic tokens suffer from the middleman attack. So, obviously RFIDs do too. Worse, the middleman attack is even easier to set up. Privacy advocates have expressed concerns about the use of RFIDs. Two implementations are compared: the use of RFID cards in the underground in Shanghai (similarly for Singapore) and the use in the London system. We conclude that privacy concerns can sometimes be addressed succesfully. We also address reliabilty concerns since RFID cards are easy to break. Finally we address the psychological issue that RFIDs are believed to be secure. © IFCA/Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Desmedt, Y. (2007). Position statement in RFID S&P panel: From relative security to perceived secure. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4886 LNCS, pp. 53–56). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77366-5_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free