Domain adversarial neural networks for domain generalization: when it works and how to improve

22Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Theoretically, domain adaptation is a well-researched problem. Further, this theory has been well-used in practice. In particular, we note the bound on target error given by Ben-David et al. (Mach Learn 79(1–2):151–175, 2010) and the well-known domain-aligning algorithm based on this work using Domain Adversarial Neural Networks (DANN) presented by Ganin and Lempitsky (in International conference on machine learning, pp 1180–1189). Recently, multiple variants of DANN have been proposed for the related problem of domain generalization, but without much discussion of the original motivating bound. In this paper, we investigate the validity of DANN in domain generalization from this perspective. We investigate conditions under which application of DANN makes sense and further consider DANN as a dynamic process during training. Our investigation suggests that the application of DANN to domain generalization may not be as straightforward as it seems. To address this, we design an algorithmic extension to DANN in the domain generalization case. Our experimentation validates both theory and algorithm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sicilia, A., Zhao, X., & Hwang, S. J. (2023). Domain adversarial neural networks for domain generalization: when it works and how to improve. Machine Learning, 112(7), 2685–2721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-023-06324-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free