Side-to-side differences in Achilles tendon geometry and mechanical properties following achilles tendon rupture

  • Zellers J
  • Cortes D
  • Corrigan P
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Recovery of tendon structure has been suggested to play a role in clinical success following Achilles tendon rupture. The purpose of this study was to identify side-to-side differences in tendon geometry and mechanical properties following Achilles tendon rupture and investigate the relationship of tendon structure with clinical outcomes. Methods: Participants within 1 year post complete rupture were included. Tendon geometry and mechanical properties were quantified using B-mode ultrasound imaging and continuous shear wave elastography (cSWE). Clinical outcomes included the heel-rise test. Participant self-reported function was measured using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score-quality of life subscale, and the Physical Activity Scale. Results: Twenty participants [mean (SD) age: 42.7(13.6) years, 13 managed surgically] were included. Tendon thickness was greater on the ruptured side (p <0.001) [median (IQR) rupture: 1.38(1.21-1.56) cm, non-rupture: 0.49(0.40-0.52)]. Tendon length to the gastrocnemius was longer (p <0.001) on ruptured [22.8 (21.71-24.31) cm] than

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zellers, J. A., Cortes, D. H., Corrigan, P., Pontiggia, L., & Grävare Silbernagel, K. (2019). Side-to-side differences in Achilles tendon geometry and mechanical properties following achilles tendon rupture. Muscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 07(03), 541. https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.03.2017.18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free