The Mediating Role of Conflict Management Styles between Organizational Justice and Affective Commitment among Academic Staffs in Malaysian Public Universities

3Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study analyzes in deep the effects of two major dimensions in organizational justice such as procedural and distributive justice on affective commitment through three conflict management styles such as integrating, compromising, and avoiding styles. These relationships are analyzed in advance on the extent of academic staff in Malaysian Public Universities. Partial Least Squares of Structural equation modelling (SEM) and Statistical Package Social Science (SPSS) are utilized to determine the effect of the two variables and the mediating effect of the conflict management styles. The results exhibit that procedural and distributive justice is significantly related with integrating, and compromising styles while not significantly related to avoiding style. It also revealed that integrating and compromising styles were significant with affective commitment while avoiding style does not relate with affective commitment. In conclusion, the results also showed only integrating and compromising styles mediate the relationship between procedural and distributive justice and affective commitment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohd Kassim, M. A., Safizal Abdullah, M., & Fitri Mansor, M. (2018). The Mediating Role of Conflict Management Styles between Organizational Justice and Affective Commitment among Academic Staffs in Malaysian Public Universities. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 150). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free