Long-term outcomes with transfascial sutures versus tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A review

51Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although most surgeons report using both transfascial sutures and laparoscopically placed tacks to secure prostheses in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, a significant minority have reported large series in which sutures were omitted. A systematic review of the available literature was conducted for large case series and controlled trials documenting long-termfollow-up. Forty-three articles were identified, including 6015 patients whose prostheses were secured with transfascial sutures (with or without tacks), and 2450 patients receiving tacks or staples alone. Themean follow-up time reported was 30.1 months. No significant difference was found in rates of hernia recurrence, mesh removal, prolonged postoperative pain, patient body mass index, or hernia defect size between the two groups. The suture group did experience a significantly higher rate of surgical site infection. Although suture tensile strength is greater than that of tacks, and despite numerous anecdotal reports of hernia recurrence secondary to suture failure or omission, the existing literature does not show superiority of one mesh fixation technique over the other for recurrence, whereas infection rates increase when transfascial suture is used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brill, J. B., & Turner, P. L. (2011). Long-term outcomes with transfascial sutures versus tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A review. American Surgeon, 77(4), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481107700423

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free