Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Relationship between Flow Proneness, Locus of Control and Behavioral Inhibition

43Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Flow is a psychological state of high but subjectively effortless attention that typically occurs during active performance of challenging tasks and is accompanied by a sense of automaticity, high control, low self-awareness, and enjoyment. Flow proneness is associated with traits and behaviors related to low neuroticism such as emotional stability, conscientiousness, active coping, self-esteem and life satisfaction. Little is known about the genetic architecture of flow proneness, behavioral inhibition and locus of control - traits also associated with neuroticism - and their interrelation. Here, we hypothesized that individuals low in behavioral inhibition and with an internal locus of control would be more likely to experience flow and explored the genetic and environmental architecture of the relationship between the three variables. Behavioral inhibition and locus of control was measured in a large population sample of 3,375 full twin pairs and 4,527 single twins, about 26% of whom also scored the flow proneness questionnaire. Findings revealed significant but relatively low correlations between the three traits and moderate heritability estimates of. 41,. 45, and. 30 for flow proneness, behavioral inhibition, and locus of control, respectively, with some indication of non-additive genetic influences. For behavioral inhibition we found significant sex differences in heritability, with females showing a higher estimate including significant non-additive genetic influences, while in males the entire heritability was due to additive genetic variance. We also found a mainly genetically mediated relationship between the three traits, suggesting that individuals who are genetically predisposed to experience flow, show less behavioral inhibition (less anxious) and feel that they are in control of their own destiny (internal locus of control). We discuss that some of the genes underlying this relationship may include those influencing the function of dopaminergic neural systems. © 2012 Mosing et al.

References Powered by Scopus

Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.

12514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A neural substrate of prediction and reward

6642Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dopamine, learning and motivation

2602Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences

189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Personality related traits as predictors of music practice: Underlying environmental and genetic influences

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individual differences in the proneness to have flow experiences are linked to dopamine D2-receptor availability in the dorsal striatum

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mosing, M. A., Pedersen, N. L., Cesarini, D., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. K. E., Nakamura, J., … Ullén, F. (2012). Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Relationship between Flow Proneness, Locus of Control and Behavioral Inhibition. PLoS ONE, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047958

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

70%

Researcher 7

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 24

56%

Social Sciences 8

19%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free