From an unpaid electricity bill to the primacy of EU law: Gian Galeazzo Stendardi and the Making of Costa v. ENEL

13Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Whilst Costa v. ENEL is the starting point for most accounts of the primacy of EU law, the story of that lawsuit is still relatively unknown. What drove Flaminio Costa to sue his electricity provider over a bill of as little as £1,925 (about €22 in 2019)? Why did the small-claims court of Milan decide to involve both the Italian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice in such a 'petty' lawsuit? Why did those two courts hand down rulings going in opposite directions? How did the lawsuit end when it came back to the Milan small-claims court? Relying upon previously undisclosed court documents and interviews with some of the actors involved, this article seeks to shed some light on the less-known aspects of the Costa v. ENEL lawsuit, against the background of electricity nationalization in Italy at the height of the Cold War, and to assess the contribution of that lawsuit and of its 'architect', Gian Galeazzo Stendardi, to the development of the doctrine of primacy of European Union law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arena, A. (2019, August 1). From an unpaid electricity bill to the primacy of EU law: Gian Galeazzo Stendardi and the Making of Costa v. ENEL. European Journal of International Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz056

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free