‘Chavs’, ‘Gyppos’ and ‘Scum’? Class in twenty-first-century drama

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter responds to a revival of interest in social class, particularly working-class identity, class relations and class exploitation on theatre stages and in scholarship in the twenty-first century. The focus is on Jez Butterworth’s Jerusalem (2009), Simon Stephens’s Port (2002) and Gillian Slovo’s The Riots (2011) and the ways in which these plays engage in a twenty-first-century class politics, and, more particularly, participate in forms of political subjectivization of working-class identity as abject, racialized, excessive and stagnant - in opposition to a normative personhood of taste, restraint, moral attunement, flexibility and the ability to self-script. Drawing on Pierre Bourdieu, Jacques Rancière, Beverley Skeggs and Imogen Tyler, the chapter considers whether these plays discover ways in which to articulate working-class subjectivity in forms that resist assimilation to already familiar classed ways of knowing and offer distinctively new forms of political theatre that intervene transgressively in the struggle over the contemporary meaning of class.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adiseshiah, S. (2016). ‘Chavs’, ‘Gyppos’ and ‘Scum’? Class in twenty-first-century drama. In Twenty-First Century Drama: What Happens Now (pp. 149–171). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48403-1_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free