Inference of genome duplications from age distributions revisited

121Citations
Citations of this article
176Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Whole-genome duplications (WGDs), thought to facilitate evolutionary innovations and adaptations, have been uncovered in many phylogenetic lineages. WGDs are frequently inferred from duplicate age distributions, where they manifest themselves as peaks against a small-scale duplication background. However, the interpretation of duplicate age distributions is complicated by the use of KS, the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site, as a proxy for the age of paralogs. Two particular concerns are the stochastic nature of synonymous substitutions leading to increasing uncertainty in KS with increasing age since duplication and KS saturation caused by the inability of evolutionary models to fully correct for the occurrence of multiple substitutions at the same site. KS stochasticity is expected to erode the signal of older WGDs, whereas K S saturation may lead to artificial peaks in the distribution. Here, we investigate the consequences of these effects on KS-based age distributions and WGD inference by simulating the evolution of duplicated sequences according to predefined real age distributions and re-estimating the corresponding KS distributions. We show that, although KS estimates can be used for WGD inference far beyond the commonly accepted K S threshold of 1, KS saturation effects can cause artificial peaks at higher ages. Moreover, KS stochasticity and saturation may lead to confounded peaks encompassing multiple WGD events and/or saturation artifacts. We argue that KS effects need to be properly accounted for when inferring WGDs from age distributions and that the failure to do so could lead to false inferences. © 2012 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vanneste, K., Van De Peer, Y., & Maere, S. (2013). Inference of genome duplications from age distributions revisited. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free