Evidential requirements for the regulatory hazard and risk assessment of respiratory sensitisers: methyl methacrylate as an example

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This review addresses the need for a framework to increase the consistency, objectivity and transparency in the regulatory assessment of respiratory sensitisers and associated uncertainties. Principal issues are considered and illustrated through a case study (with methyl methacrylate). In the absence of test methods validated for regulatory use, formal documentation of the weight-of-evidence for hazard classification both at the level of integration of individual studies within lines of evidence and across a broad range of data streams was agreed to be critical for such a framework. An integrated approach is proposed to include not only occupational studies and clinical evidence for the regulatory assessment of respiratory sensitisers, but also information on structure and physical and chemical factors, predictive approaches such as structure activity analysis and in vitro and in vivo mechanistic and toxicokinetic findings. A weight-of-evidence protocol, incorporating integration of these sources of data based on predefined considerations, would contribute to transparency and consistency in the outcome of the assessment. In those cases where a decision may need to be taken on the basis of occupational findings alone, conclusions should be based on transparent weighting of relevant data on the observed prevalence of occupational asthma in various studies taking into account all relevant information including the range and nature of workplace exposures to the substance of interest, co-exposure to other chemicals and study quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meek, B., Bridges, J. W., Fasey, A., & Sauer, U. G. (2023, April 1). Evidential requirements for the regulatory hazard and risk assessment of respiratory sensitisers: methyl methacrylate as an example. Archives of Toxicology. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03448-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free