Vitamin K antagonist use and mortality in dialysis patients

12Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. The risk-benefit ratio of vitamin K antagonists for different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in patients with end-stage renal disease treated with dialysis is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between vitamin K antagonist use and mortality for different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in a cohort of end-stage renal disease patients receiving dialysis treatment. Methods. We prospectively followed 1718 incident dialysis patients. Hazard ratios were calculated for all-cause and causespecific (stroke, bleeding, cardiovascular and other) mortality associated with vitamin K antagonist use. Results. Vitamin K antagonist use as compared with no vitamin K antagonist use was associated with a 1.2-fold [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.0-1.5] increased all-cause mortality risk, a 1.5-fold (95% CI 0.6-4.0) increased stroke mortality risk, a 1.3-fold (95% CI 0.4-4.2) increased bleeding mortality risk, a 1.2-fold (95% CI 0.9-1.8) increased cardiovascular mortality risk and a 1.2-fold (95% CI 0.8-1.6) increased other mortality risk after adjustment. Within patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score 1, vitamin K antagonist use was associated with a 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.0-7.8) increased all-cause mortality risk as compared with no vitamin K antagonist use, while vitamin K antagonist use within patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score 2 was not associated with an increasedmortality risk after adjustment. Conclusion. Vitamin K antagonist use was not associated with a protective effect on mortality in the different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in dialysis patients. The lack of knowledge on the indication for vitamin K antagonist use could lead to confounding by indication.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voskamp, P. W. M., Rookmaaker, M. B., Verhaar, M. C., Dekker, F. W., & Ocak, G. (2018). Vitamin K antagonist use and mortality in dialysis patients. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 33(1), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx199

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free