Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation using vitamin K antagonists, aspirin or direct acting oral anticoagulants

12Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become available for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Conflicting results have been published on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with the use of DOACs in comparison with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk of AMI in patients with AF who are exposed to either VKAs, DOACs or low-dose (< 325 mg) aspirin. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2008–2014). The study population (n = 30 146) consisted of all patients ≥18 years with a diagnosis of AF who were new users of VKAs, DOACs (rivaroxaban and dabigatran) or aspirin. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of AMI for users of DOACs or aspirin vs. VKA. Adjustments were made for age, gender, lifestyle, risk factors, comorbidity and other drugs. Results: The risk of AMI was doubled when we compared current use of DOACs with current use of VKAs [adjusted HR 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08, 4.12] and for current users of aspirin vs. current VKA users (adjusted HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.45, 2.51). Conclusions: There is a twofold increase in the risk of AMI for users of DOACs, in comparison with VKAs, in AF therapy. In addition, the results suggested that in patients with AF, the incidence of AMI is higher during aspirin monotherapy than during the use of VKAs.

References Powered by Scopus

Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

9806Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study

9531Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

8181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin: Is new always better than the old?

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stolk, L. M., de Vries, F., Ebbelaar, C., de Boer, A., Schalekamp, T., Souverein, P., … Burden, A. M. (2017). Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation using vitamin K antagonists, aspirin or direct acting oral anticoagulants. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 83(8), 1835–1843. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13264

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

65%

Researcher 13

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 34

63%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 14

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

7%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 11

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free