Strata of intervenient concepts in normative systems

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Writing a contract of a specific content is a ground for purchase, purchase is a ground for ownership, ownership is a ground for power to dispose. Also power to dispose is a consequence of ownership, ownership is a consequence of purchase. etc. The paper presents a continuation of the authors' previous algebraic representation on ground - consequence chains in normative systems.The paper analyzes different kinds of "implicative closeness" between grounds and consequences in chains of legal concepts, in particular combinations of "weakest ground", "strongest consequence" and "minimal joining". The idea of a concept's being intermediate between concepts of two different sorts is captured by the technical notion of "intervenient", defined in terms of weakest ground and strongest consequence. A legal example concerning grounds and consequences of "ownership" and "trust" is used to illustrate the application of the formal theory. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lindahl, L., & Odelstad, J. (2008). Strata of intervenient concepts in normative systems. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5076 LNAI, pp. 203–217). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70525-3_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free