Parliamentary administrations in the scrutiny of EU decision-making

9Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In liberal democracies, parliaments are generally perceived as the epitome of majoritarian politics. In the academic literature, as in the public debate, the focus is inevitably on the party political dimension of their work: the adoption of legislation or annual budgets, the election and scrutiny of the executive and their important role in the political system as a forum for debate on key issues. The study of parliaments is usually about either the work of individual members of parliament (MPs) or that of groups of parliamentarians, be it the factions of political parties or the broader concepts of a governing majority and the opposition, but parliaments are more than the collective sum of their elected members. In order to function as institutions and exercise their functions, they also rely on administrative structures and appointed officials. In fact, in all parliaments the non-elected staff probably significantly outnumber the elected members.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Högenauer, A. L., & Christiansen, T. (2016). Parliamentary administrations in the scrutiny of EU decision-making. In The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (pp. 116–132). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28913-1_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free