Researchers distinguish two approaches that are paradigmatic for the cluster of social theories: positivist and interpretivist. We have outlined the problematic core that contains the main differences between positivist and interpretivist sociology. In our opinion, the opposition between positivist and interpretive sociology is indicative of social theory, and we have shown the dual nature of social reality. We refuted the classification of social theories into nominalist and realist, showing that such a division does not reveal the dual nature of social reality. The difference between interpretivism and positivism is that positivist sociology focuses on the study of social systems as an independent reality, while interpretive social theory thematises social reality as a socio-cultural universe, and from this perspective raises the question of social institutions.
CITATION STYLE
Shcherbak, S. (2003). Positivism and interpretivism in the light of the dual nature of social reality. Sententiae, 8(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent08.01.003
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.