Positivism and interpretivism in the light of the dual nature of social reality

  • Shcherbak S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Researchers distinguish two approaches that are paradigmatic for the cluster of social theories: positivist and interpretivist. We have outlined the problematic core that contains the main differences between positivist and interpretivist sociology. In our opinion, the opposition between positivist and interpretive sociology is indicative of social theory, and we have shown the dual nature of social reality. We refuted the classification of social theories into nominalist and realist, showing that such a division does not reveal the dual nature of social reality. The difference between interpretivism and positivism is that positivist sociology focuses on the study of social systems as an independent reality, while interpretive social theory thematises social reality as a socio-cultural universe, and from this perspective raises the question of social institutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shcherbak, S. (2003). Positivism and interpretivism in the light of the dual nature of social reality. Sententiae, 8(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent08.01.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free