Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design

49Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this issue of the Journal, Sullivan et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(5):345-353) carefully examine the theoretical justification for use of the test-negative design, a common observational study design, in assessing the effectiveness of influenza vaccination. Using modern causal inference methods (in particular, directed acyclic graphs), they describe different threats to the validity of inferences drawn about the effect of vaccination from test-negative design studies. These threats include confounding, selection bias, and measurement error in either the exposure or the outcome. While confounding and measurement error are common in observational studies, the potential for selection bias inherent in the test-negative design brings into question the validity of inferences drawn from such studies.

References Powered by Scopus

Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference

685Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness

399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Theoretical Basis of the Test-Negative Study Design for Assessment of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness

227Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a plant-derived, quadrivalent, virus-like particle influenza vaccine in adults (18–64 years) and older adults (≥65 years): two multicentre, randomised phase 3 trials

154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Immune history and influenza vaccine effectiveness

148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraseason waning of influenza vaccine effectiveness

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Westreich, D., & Hudgens, M. G. (2016, September 1). Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design. American Journal of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww063

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

63%

Researcher 6

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

57%

Mathematics 7

23%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

13%

Social Sciences 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 22

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0