Changing the Law on Physical Punishment in New Zealand

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Corporal or physical punishment is defined as: “Any punishment in which force is used and intended to cause some degree of pain or discomfort, how- ever light” (United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), General Comment No. 8, 2006b, para 11). There is a subtle and fuzzy dis- tinction between definitions of physical punishment and physical abuse, the main difference being the frequency and intensity of the physical vio- lence against children. The dividing line between physical punishment and physical abuse is contested, determined largely by cultural values, and there is no consensus among professionals or researchers about the distinction. “Non-abusive” spanking has been defined by US researchers as 2.5 times within a 27-hour time space, but spanking 6 times a day is deemed to be abusive (Cheng, 2000; Whipple & Richey, 1997). Although injury to the child may help to define the distinction between physical punishment and physical abuse, there are many countries, including the UK and Australia (and before 2007, in New Zealand), where injury to the child is defended as “reasonable chastisement or punishment” or “reasonable force” (Saunders & Goddard, 2010).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, A. B. (2015). Changing the Law on Physical Punishment in New Zealand. In Studies in Childhood and Youth (pp. 33–47). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137386106_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free