FAIL! Are We Headed towards Critical Failure Studies?

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The chapter outlines the scope and structure of the Routledge International Handbook of Failure. It makes a point about the tendency in recent works on failure to advance critical rhetoric and provides a genealogical scrutiny that goes beyond the episodic materialization of failure, that is, failure as an event. This analysis further aims to reveal the complexity of relations, institutions, and understandings that constitute regimes and cultures of failure. The chapter signals the main dimensions targeted and unravelled in this new research on failure: inequality, invisibility, power, the future, reimagining of neoliberal logics of success, and failure alternatives. It also allows readers to grasp the critical and analytical synergy in critical failure studies, both ongoing and planned, which approach the subject from a variety of disciplines, such as sociology, anthropology, international relations, and development research, public policy, organization and management studies, science and technology studies (STS), queer theory, disability studies, performance studies, narrative analysis, and cultural theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mica, A., Pawlak, M., Horolets, A., & Kubicki, P. (2023). FAIL! Are We Headed towards Critical Failure Studies? In Routledge International Handbook of Failure (pp. 3–22). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429355950-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free