Associations between theory of mind and conduct problems in autistic and nonautistic youth

6Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Many autistic young people exhibit co-occurring behavior difficulties, characterized by conduct problems and oppositional behavior. However, the causes of these co-occurring difficulties are not well understood. Impairments in theory of mind (ToM) are often reported in autistic individuals and have been linked to conduct problems in nonautistic individuals. Whether an association between ToM ability and conduct problems exists in autistic populations, whether this association is similar between individuals who are autistic versus nonautistic, and whether these associations are specific to conduct problems (as opposed to other domains of psychopathology) remains unclear. ToM ability was assessed using the Frith–Happé Triangles task in a pooled sample of autistic (N = 128; mean age 14.78 years) and nonautistic youth (N = 50; mean age 15.48 years), along with parent-rated psychiatric symptoms of conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention and emotional problems. Analyses tested ToM ability between autistic versus nonautistic participants, and compared associations between ToM performance and conduct problems between the two groups. Where no significant group differences in associations were found, the pooled association between ToM and conduct problems was estimated in the combined sample. Results showed no evidence of moderation in associations by diagnostic status, and an association between poorer ToM ability and higher levels of conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention and emotional problems across the total sample. However, these associations became nonsignificant when adjusting for verbal IQ. Results provide support for theoretical models of co-occurring psychopathology in autistic populations, and suggest targets for intervention for conduct problems in autistic youth. Lay Summary: Many young people with autism spectrum disorder show co-occurring behavior problems, but the causes of these are not well understood. This paper found an association between difficulties recognizing what others think and intend (so-called “theory of mind”) in a simple animated task, and emotional and behavioral problems in autistic and nonautistic young people. However, a substantial part of this association was explained by individual differences in verbal ability. These findings may have implications for intervention efforts to improve young people's mental health.

References Powered by Scopus

The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism

6229Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire

5244Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias

5125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factors influencing the mental health of autistic children and teenagers: Parents’ observations and experiences

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Scoping Review of Research Evaluating Physiological Information for Individuals With Developmental Disabilities: Augmentative and Alternative Communication Research Considerations

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How word meaning structure relates to executive functioning and theory of mind in children with developmental language disorder: A multiple case study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carter Leno, V., Chandler, S., White, P., Yorke, I., Charman, T., Jones, C. R. G., … Simonoff, E. (2021). Associations between theory of mind and conduct problems in autistic and nonautistic youth. Autism Research, 14(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2346

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

85%

Researcher 3

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 29

81%

Materials Science 3

8%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

6%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free