Who deserves my trust? Cue-elicited feedback negativity tracks reputation learning in repeated social interactions

14Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Trust and trustworthiness contribute to reciprocal behavior and social relationship development. To make better decisions, people need to evaluate others’ trustworthiness. They often assess this kind of reputation by learning through repeated social interactions. The present event-related potential (ERP) study explored the reputation learning process in a repeated trust game where subjects made multi-round decisions of investment to different partners. We found that subjects gradually learned to discriminate trustworthy partners from untrustworthy ones based on how often their partners reciprocated the investment, which was indicated by their own investment decisions. Besides, electrophysiological data showed that the faces of the untrustworthy partners induced larger feedback negativity (FN) amplitude than those of the trustworthy partners, but only in the late phase of the game. The ERP results corresponded with the behavioral pattern and revealed that the learned trustworthiness differentiation was coded by the cue-elicited FN component. Consistent with previous research, our findings suggest that the anterior cue-elicited FN reflects the reputation appraisal and tracks the reputation learning process in social interactions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, D., Meng, L., & Ma, Q. (2017). Who deserves my trust? Cue-elicited feedback negativity tracks reputation learning in repeated social interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free