Erratum to: 8th annual meeting of Chinese College of Surgeons and 19th annual meeting of the European Society of Surgery

  • ARIKAN A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The proceedings contain 757 papers. The topics discussed include: comparison of clinical outcome and prognosis in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma by transthoracic and transabdominal hiatal approaches: a single Chinese teaching hospital retrospective cohort study; comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer; evaluating the clinical feasibility: the direct bisulfite genomic sequencing for examination of methylated status of protocadherin10 (PCDH10) promoter to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer; hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy: a prospective study; initial discussion of the ratio between negative and positive lymph nodes as an alternative category to N stage of the 7th TNM classification for prediction the prognosis of gastric cancer patients after curative surgery; and is it feasible and safe for laparoscopic resection for gastric GIST larger than 5cm? result from a prospective study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

ARIKAN, A. E. (2015). Erratum to: 8th annual meeting of Chinese College of Surgeons and 19th annual meeting of the European Society of Surgery. European Surgery, 47(5), 279–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-015-0335-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free