Capturing Change: Comparing Pretest-Posttest and Retrospective Evaluation Methods

  • Gouldthorpe J
  • Israel G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two models that are commonly used in Extension programming to capture change over a short period of time are the pretest-posttest model and the retrospective pretest (or post-then-pre) model. When deciding which model to use, Extension professionals should keep in mind that each participant has a knowledge base that includes both factual information and perceptions pertaining to factual information. As you read about the strengths and weaknesses of these two design models, consider how each model fits the evaluation situation to select the one that can best measure change in your program. This 4-page fact sheet was written by Jessica L. Gouldthorpe and Glenn D. Israel and published by the UF Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, January 2013. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wc135

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gouldthorpe, J. L., & Israel, G. D. (2013). Capturing Change: Comparing Pretest-Posttest and Retrospective Evaluation Methods. EDIS, 2013(1). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-wc135-2013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free