Correction to: Are there differences among operators in false-negative rates of endosonography with needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer? (BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2018) 19 (14) DOI: 10.1186/s12890-018-0774-6)

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Following publication of the original article [1], the author flagged that the "True negative" values given in Table 1, for "Excluding patients with inaccessible LNs", were wrong for "Adenocarcinoma", "Squamous cell carcinoma" and "Others". The (incorrect) values previously given were 273 (46.0) for "Adenocarcinoma", 44 (7.4) for "Squamous cell carcinoma", and a blank value for "Others". Please be advised that the correct values are: 277 (46.6) for "Adenocarcinoma". 273 (46.0) for "Squamous cell carcinoma". 44 (7.4) for "Other". The original article has now been corrected to reflect this. The publisher apologizes for this error.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S., Shin, B., Lee, H., Ha, J. H., Lee, K., Um, S. W., … Jeong, B. H. (2019, March 25). Correction to: Are there differences among operators in false-negative rates of endosonography with needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer? (BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2018) 19 (14) DOI: 10.1186/s12890-018-0774-6). BMC Pulmonary Medicine. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0805-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free