Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación (I): hacia la perspectiva GRADE

  • Aguilera Eguía R
  • Zafra Santos E
  • Rojas Sepúlveda C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nowadays, it is being important to take clinical decisions based on the best levels of evidence and grades of recommendation because both concepts are a fundamental pillar of evidence- based practice. Currently we can count over a hundred tools, 19 systems to assess the quality and 7 to grade the recommendations, the scales can use letters (A, B, C, etc.), numbers (I, II, III) or a combination of both (Ia, IIb, IIa, etc.) but the way to express the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation is quite unequal among different scales, showing differences in the criteria of graduation, reproducibility, and interpretation of the grades of recommendation, that can confuse and increase the uncertainty when making a clinical decision. The purpose of our work is to show the initiatory GRADE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aguilera Eguía, R., Zafra Santos, E., Rojas Sepúlveda, C., Aguayo Alcayaga, G., Sánchez León, D., & Aguilera Eguía, T. (2014). Niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación (I): hacia la perspectiva GRADE. Revista de La Sociedad Española Del Dolor, 21(2), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1134-80462014000200006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free