Secular trends in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated in a tertiary-care hospital: Increasing prevalence and accelerated decline in antimicrobial susceptibility

5Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Klebsiella pneumoniae has become an increasingly important etiologic agent of nosocomial infections in recent years. This is mainly due to the expression of virulence factors and development of resistance to several antimicrobial drugs. Methods: This retrospective study examines data obtained from the microbiology laboratory of a Brazilian tertiary-care hospital. To assess temporal trends in prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility, K. pneumoniae isolates were analyzed from 2000 to 2013. The relative frequencies of K. pneumoniae isolation were calculated among all Gram-negative bacilli isolated in each period analyzed. Susceptibility tests were performed using automated systems. Results: From 2000-2006, K. pneumonia isolates comprised 10.7% of isolated Gram-negative bacilli (455/4260). From 2007-2013, this percentage was 18.1% (965/5331). Strictly considering isolates from bloodstream infections, the relative annual prevalence of K. pneumoniae increased from 14-17% to 27-32% during the same periods. A progressive decrease in K. pneumoniae susceptibility to all antimicrobial agents assessed was detected. Partial resistance was also observed to antimicrobial drugs that have been used more recently, such as colistin and tigecycline. Conclusions: Our study indicates that K. pneumoniae has become a major pathogen among hospitalized patients and confirms its recent trend of increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santana, R. de C., Gaspar, G. G., Vilar, F. C., Bellissimo-Rodrigues, F., & Martinez, R. (2016). Secular trends in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated in a tertiary-care hospital: Increasing prevalence and accelerated decline in antimicrobial susceptibility. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 49(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0072-2016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free