Comparative genome analysis of Megasphaera sp. reveals niche specialization and its potential role in the human gut

136Citations
Citations of this article
185Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With increasing number of novel bacteria being isolated from the human gut ecosystem, there is a greater need to study their role in the gut ecosystem and their effect on the host health. In the present study, we carried out in silico genome-wide analysis of two novel Megasphaera sp. isolates NM10 (DSM25563) and BL7 (DSM25562), isolated from feces of two healthy individuals and validated the key features by in vitro studies. The analysis revealed the general metabolic potential, adaptive features and the potential effects of these isolates on the host. The comparative genome analysis of the two human gut isolates NM10 and BL7 with ruminal isolate Megasphaera elsdenii (DSM20460) highlighted the differential adaptive features for their survival in human gut. The key findings include features like bile resistance, presence of various sensory and regulatory systems, stress response systems, membrane transporters and resistance to antibiotics. Comparison of the "glycobiome" based on the genomes of the ruminal isolate with the human gut isolates NM10 and BL revealed the presence of diverse and unique sets of Carbohydrate-Active enzymes (CAZymes) amongst these isolates, with a higher collection of CAZymes in the human gut isolates. This could be attributed to the difference in host diet and thereby the environment, consequently suggesting host specific adaptation in these isolates. In silico analysis of metabolic potential predicted the ability of these isolates to produce important metabolites like short chain fatty acids (butyrate, acetate, formate, and caproate), vitamins and essential amino acids, which was further validated by in vitro experiments. The ability of these isolates to produce important metabolites advocates for a potential healthy influence on the host. Further in vivo studies including transcriptomic and proteomic analysis will be required for better understanding the role and impact of these Megasphaera sp. isolates NM10 and BL7 on the human host. © 2013 Shetty et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. The predicted sub-system features in the genomes of Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 and M. elsdenii DSM20460.
  • Figure 2. Comparison of protein sequences of Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 and M. elsdenii DSM20460. The color code indicates the percent similarity between the predicted protein sequences. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079353.g002
  • Figure 3. The distribution of different CAZyme families in genome of Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 and M. elsdenii (DSM20460). A) Distribution of Carbohydrate-Binding Modules (CBMs). B) Distribution of Glycoside Hydrolases (GHs). C) Distribution of Glycosyl Transferases (GTs), D) Distribution of Carbohydrate Esterases (CEs). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079353.g003
  • Figure 4. The Glycobiome network ofMegasphaera sp. A) The glycobiome network of Human (red), Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 (green) and M. elsdenii DSM20460 (yellow). B) The glycobiome network of Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 (green) and M. elsdenii DSM20460 (red). CBMs- CarbohydrateBinding Modules, GHs- Glycoside Hydrolases, GTs- Glycosyl Transferases, CEs- Carbohydrate Esterases. The nodes represent the CAZyme superfamilies and the edges are connecting the nodes based on the presence or absence of respective superfamilies in the organism. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079353.g004
  • Figure 5. Distribution of CRISPRs and phage-associated genes in the genomes of Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 and M. elsdenii DSM20460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079353.g005
  • Figure 7. Fermentation products of lactate utilization by Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 and M. elsdenii DSM20460. The error bar represents standard deviation of three technical repliactes. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079353.g007
  • Figure 6. Fermentation products of glucose utilization by Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 and M. elsdenii DSM20460. The error bar represents standard deviation of three technical repliactes. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079353.g006
  • Figure 8. Gas production by Megasphaera sp. NM10, BL7 and M. elsdenii DSM20460 using glucose and lactate as substrates. The error bar represents standard deviation of three technical repliactes. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079353.g008

References Powered by Scopus

MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0

26067Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology

9507Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing

9014Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Alterations of the gut microbiome in hypertension

356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Longitudinal investigation of the swine gut microbiome from birth to market reveals stage and growth performance associated bacteria

314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of synbiotic supplement on human gut microbiota, body composition and weight loss in obesity

221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shetty, S. A., Marathe, N. P., Lanjekar, V., Ranade, D., & Shouche, Y. S. (2013). Comparative genome analysis of Megasphaera sp. reveals niche specialization and its potential role in the human gut. PLoS ONE, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079353

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 71

60%

Researcher 35

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53

50%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 30

28%

Immunology and Microbiology 15

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0