Controversy in the treatment of symptomatic internal rectal prolapse: Suspension or resection?

16Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Internal rectal prolapse (IRP) is a full-thickness intussusception of the rectum during defecation. Radiologically, different grades have been proposed: from low-grade (rectorectal intussusception) to high-grade (rectoanal intussusception) prolapse. This prolapse may lead to an outlet obstruction and/or fecal incontinence. IRP plays an important role in the pathophysiology of obstructed defecation (OD), which is the inability to empty the rectum satisfactorily during defecation and is more specifically defined in the Rome III criteria. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Festen, S., Van Geloven, A. A. W., D’Hoore, A., Lindsey, I., & Gerhards, M. F. (2011). Controversy in the treatment of symptomatic internal rectal prolapse: Suspension or resection? Surgical Endoscopy, 25(6), 2000–2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1501-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free