Influence of the mixing ratio on antibacterial characteristics of MgO-ZnO solid solution in two phase coexistence region

18Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Though occurrence of the antibacterial activity on some oxides, MgO and ZnO, is well-known, it is not clear what the mixing ratio among solid solutions affects antibacterial activity. In present work, change in antibacterial activity with the mixing ratio of two-type solid solutions, Mg 1-xZnxO with cubic structure and Zn1-xMgxO with hexagonal structure, was studied. After MgO and ZnO powders were mixed with the molar ratio (MgO/ZnO) of 0.44, 1.22 and 1.86, the solid solutions were obtained by heating at 1200°C for 5 h in air. By X-ray diffraction measurement, it was found that two-type solid solutions of cubic and hexagonal structure were formed at the molar ratio of 1.22-0.44. The formation amount of cubic-type solid solution increased with increasing the molar ratio. At the molar ratio of 1.86, cubic-type solid solution was formed without any hexagonal-type. In three powder samples of the obtained solid solutions, antibacterial characteristics were examined by colony count method, using Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. In the case of the mixture of cubic- and hexagonal-type solid solutions, antibacterial activity enhanced with increasing the formation amount of cubic-type solid solution. The powder sample with a single phase of cubic-type solid solution showed strongest antibacterial activity in three powder samples. As mentioned above, the mixing ratio of two-type solid solutions with cubic and hexagonal structure was found to affect antibacterial activity. © 2008 The Ceramic Society of Japan. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohira, T., Kawamura, M., Iida, Y., Fukuda, M., & Yamamoto, O. (2008). Influence of the mixing ratio on antibacterial characteristics of MgO-ZnO solid solution in two phase coexistence region. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 116(1359), 1234–1237. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.116.1234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free