Relating stabilizing timing assumptions to stabilizing failure detectors regarding solvability and efficiency

9Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We investigate computational models with stabilizing properties. Such models include e.g. the partially synchronous model [Dwork et al. 1988], where after some unknown global stabilization time the system complies to bounds on computing speeds and message delays, or the asynchronous model augmented with unreliable failure detectors [Chandra et al. 1996], where after some unknown global stabilization time failure detectors stop making mistakes. Using algorithm transformations (a notion we introduce in this paper) we show that many (families of such) models are equivalent regarding solvability. We also analyze the efficiency of such transformations regarding not only the number of steps in a model M1 necessary to emulate a step in a model M 2, but also the stabilization shift, which bounds the number of steps in M2 required to provide properties of M2 after the stabilization of M1. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biely, M., Hutle, M., Penso, L. D., & Widder, J. (2007). Relating stabilizing timing assumptions to stabilizing failure detectors regarding solvability and efficiency. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4838 LNCS, pp. 4–20). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76627-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free