Design, optimization and energetic efficiency of producing hydrogen-rich gas from biomass steam gasification

32Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, the conceptual design of biomass steam gasification (BSG) processes using raw oil palm (ROP) and torrefied oil palm (TOP) are examined in an Aspen Plus simulator. Through thermodynamic analysis, it is verified that the BSG process with torrefied feedstock can effectively enhance the hydrogen yield. When the heat recovery design is added into the BSG process, the system energetic efficiency (SEE) is significantly improved. Finally, an optimization algorithm with respect to SEE and hydrogen yield is solved, and the optimum operating conditions are validated by simulations.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Flow chart of the steam gasification process.
  • Table 1. The comparison of predicted results with the experimental data from [26].
  • Table 2. A list of chemical reactions in the gasifier [2,27].
  • Table 3. Proximate and elemental analyses of the feedstock used in the simulation [28].
  • Table 4. Simulation of operating condition and gasification parameters.
  • Figure 2. Effects of the S/C ratio on product distribution of (a) H2; (b) CO; (c) CO2; and (d) CH4.
  • Figure 3. Effects of the S/C ratio on (a) solid yield and (b) hydrogen yield.
  • Figure 4. Effects of the S/C ratio on distributions of lower heating value.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

677Citations
1434Readers
Get full text
284Citations
617Readers
Get full text

Gasification of biowaste: A critical review and outlooks

249Citations
477Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuo, P. C., & Wu, W. (2015). Design, optimization and energetic efficiency of producing hydrogen-rich gas from biomass steam gasification. Energies, 8(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010094

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

71%

Researcher 8

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 27

40%

Energy 19

28%

Chemical Engineering 16

24%

Environmental Science 6

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0