A comparison of the historical entries in wikipedia and Baidu Baike

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research chose two representative online encyclopedias, Wikipedia (English) and Baidu Baike, to compare their performance on historical entries. This research purposefully chose 6 entries and developed a framework to evaluate their performance in accuracy, breadth, depth, informativeness, conciseness and objectiveness. The result shows that: Wikipedia is superior in most cases while Baidu Baike is a little better in the entries on Chinese history. The operating mechanism is the main reason for it. The result implies that in the field of history, well-established online encyclopedias can be reliable for common users although improvement such as developing operating mechanisms is still needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shang, W. (2018). A comparison of the historical entries in wikipedia and Baidu Baike. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10766 LNCS, pp. 74–80). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free