An Incentive-Compatible Experiment on Probabilistic Insurance and Implications for an Insurer's Solvency Level

26Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article is the first to conduct an incentive-compatible experiment using real monetary payoffs to test the hypothesis of probabilistic insurance, which states that willingness to pay for insurance decreases sharply in the presence of even small default probabilities as compared to a risk-free insurance contract. In our experiment, 181 participants state their willingness to pay for insurance contracts with different levels of default risk. We find that the willingness to pay sharply decreases with increasing default risk. Our results, hence, strongly support the hypothesis of probabilistic insurance. Furthermore, we study the impact of customer reaction to default risk on an insurer's optimal solvency level using our experimentally obtained data on insurance demand. We show that an insurer should choose to be default-free rather than having even a very small default probability. This risk strategy is also optimal when assuming substantial transaction costs for risk management activities undertaken to achieve the maximum solvency level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zimmer, A., Gründl, H., Schade, C. D., & Glenzer, F. (2018). An Incentive-Compatible Experiment on Probabilistic Insurance and Implications for an Insurer’s Solvency Level. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 85(1), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12148

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free