Space-efficient deterministic simulation of probabilistic automata

12Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Given a description of a probabilistic automaton (one-head probabilistic finite automaton or probabilistic Turing machine) and an input string x of length n, we ask how much space does a deterministic Turing machine need in order to decide the acceptance of an input string by that automaton? The question is interesting even in the case of one-head one-way probabilistic finite automata. We call (rational) stochastic languages (Formula Found) the class of languages recognized by these devices with rational transition probabilities and rational cutpoint. Our main results are as follows: The (proper) inclusion of (Formula Found) in Dspace (log n), which is optimal (i.e. (Formula Found) Dspace (o(log n))). The previous upper bounds were Dspace(n) [Dieu 1972], [Wang 1992] and Dspace(log n log log n) [Jung 1984]. The inclusion of the languages recognized by S(n) ϵ O(log n) spacebounded probabilistic Turing machines in Dspace(min(2S(n) log n, log n(S(n)+ loglogn))). The previous upper bound was Dspace(logn(S(n)+log logn)) [Jung 1984]. Of independent interest is our technique to compare numbers given in terms of their values modulo a sequence of primes, p1 < p2 < pn = O(na) (where a is some constant) in O(log n) deterministic space.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Macarie, I. I. (1994). Space-efficient deterministic simulation of probabilistic automata. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 775 LNCS, pp. 109–121). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57785-8_135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free