Efficacy of sotrastaurin plus tacrolimus after de novo kidney transplantation: Randomized, phase II trial results

34Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sotrastaurin, a novel immunosuppressant, blocks early T cell activation through protein kinase C inhibition. Efficacy and safety of sotrastaurin with tacrolimus were assessed in a dose-ranging non-inferiority study in renal transplant recipients. A total of 298 patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive sotrastaurin 100 (n = 77; discontinued in December 2011) or 200 mg (n = 73) b.i.d. plus standard tacrolimus (sTAC; 5-12 ng/mL), sotrastaurin 300 mg (n = 75) b.i.d. plus reduced tacrolimus (rTAC; 2-5 ng/mL) or enteric-coated mycophenolic acid (MPA) plus sTAC (n = 73); all patients received basiliximab and corticosteroids. Composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection ≥ grade IA, graft loss, death or loss to follow up) rates at Month 12 were 18.8%, 12.4%, 10.9% and 14.0% for the sotrastaurin 100, 200 and 300 mg, and MPA groups, respectively. The median estimated glomerular filtration rates were 55.7, 53.3, 64.9 and 59.2 mL/min, respectively. Mean heart rates were faster with higher sotrastaurin doses and discontinuations due to adverse events and gastrointestinal adverse events were more common. Fewer patients in the sotrastaurin groups experienced leukopenia than in the MPA group (1.3-5.5% vs. 16.5%). Sotrastaurin 200 and 300 mg had comparable efficacy to MPA in prevention of rejection with no significant difference in renal function between the groups. © Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Russ, G. R., Tedesco-Silva, H., Kuypers, D. R., Cohney, S., Langer, R. M., Witzke, O., … Budde, K. (2013). Efficacy of sotrastaurin plus tacrolimus after de novo kidney transplantation: Randomized, phase II trial results. American Journal of Transplantation, 13(7), 1746–1756. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free