Small molecules with similar structures exhibit Agonist, neutral Antagonist or inverse Agonist activity toward Angiotensin II type 1 receptor

21Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Small differences in the chemical structures of ligands can be responsible for agonism, neutral antagonism or inverse agonism toward a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Although each ligand may stabilize the receptor conformation in a different way, little is known about the precise conformational differences. We synthesized the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, R239470 and R794847, which induced inverse agonism, antagonism and agonism, respectively, and then investigated the ligand-specific changes in the receptor conformation with respect to stabilization around transmembrane (TM)3. The results of substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies support the novel concept that ligand-induced changes in the conformation of TM3 play a role in stabilizing GPCR. Although the agonist-, neutral antagonist and inverse agonist-binding sites in the AT1 receptor are similar, each ligand induced specific conformational changes in TM3. In addition, all of the experimental data were obtained with functional receptors in a native membrane environment (in situ). © 2012 Miura et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miura, S. ichiro, Kiya, Y., Hanzawa, H., Nakao, N., Fujino, M., Imaizumi, S., … Saku, K. (2012). Small molecules with similar structures exhibit Agonist, neutral Antagonist or inverse Agonist activity toward Angiotensin II type 1 receptor. PLoS ONE, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free