Whose Children? Protecting Unaccompanied Migrant Children in Europe: A Case of Diffused Responsibility?

7Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the reasons behind the failure of EU and national policy interventions to protect unaccompanied migrant children's (unaccompanied minors - uams) rights during the refugee crisis in Europe. By drawing on policy documents and empirical data, it is argued that the deficient protection of uam s' child rights was essentially a failure of responsibility allocation in line with the "bystander effect"analytical explanation. While this argument does not disregard the role of other explanatory factors, such as the lack of European solidarity, poor legal enforcement and financial reasons, among others, it is claimed that the diffusion of responsibility (in theory and practice) between various policy systems at the national level, as well as between the EU and domestic levels, contributed to the failure to protect uam s' child rights across Europe.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iusmen, I. (2020). Whose Children? Protecting Unaccompanied Migrant Children in Europe: A Case of Diffused Responsibility? International Journal of Children’s Rights, 28(4), 925–949. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-28040006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free