Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study

  • Nakamura N
  • Okafuji Y
  • Adachi S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the effects of mammary gland density and average glandular dose (AGD) on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of breast-equivalent phantoms with different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios. Full-field digital-mammography breast X-rays were performed on breast-equivalent phantoms with three different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios (Phantom A [30/70], Phantom B [50/50], and Phantom C [70/30]) and seven thicknesses ranging from 10 mm to 70 mm. The prediction formula for the CNR was calculated by multivariate analysis and the effects of the various parameters on CNR were evaluated using a multiple regression analysis model. Higher CNR values were obtained with lower mammary gland/fat tissue ratios and lower phantom thicknesses. Variation in CNR among the three breast models was low (coefficient of variation, 3.4–8.7%) at lower phantom thicknesses (10–30 mm) and high (coefficient of variation, 10.5–16.8%) at higher phantom thickness (50–70 mm). CNR showed a strong negative correlation (r = -0.8989) with AGD across all three mammary gland ratios. A predictive formula for CNR using AGD and mammary gland density was developed. CNR can be predicted with high precision using AGD and mammary gland density. The predicted CNR could be used to measure the diagnostic reliability of mammography in breast cancer.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakamura, N., Okafuji, Y., Adachi, S., Takahashi, K., Nakakuma, T., & Ueno, S. (2018). Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study. Radiology Research and Practice, 2018, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6192594

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 3

50%

Computer Science 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free