Sinistrals are rarely “right”: Evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms

9Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although current neuroscience and behavioral studies provide substantial understanding of tool representations (e.g., the processing of tool-related affordances) in the human brain, most of this knowledge is limited to right-handed individuals with typical organization of cognitive and manual skills. Therefore, any insights from these lines of research may be of little value in rehabilitation of patients with atypical laterality of praxis and/or hand dominance. To fill this gap, we tested perceptual processing of man-made objects in 18 healthy left-handers who were likely to show greater incidence of right-sided or bilateral (atypical) lateralization of functions. In the two experiments reported here, participants performed a tool vs. non-tool categorization task. In Experiment 1, target and distracter objects were presented for 200 ms in the left (LVF) or right (RVF) visual field, followed by 200 ms masks. In Experiment 2, the centrally presented targets were preceded by masked primes of 35 ms duration, again presented in the LVF or RVF. Based on results from both studies, i.e., response times (RTs) to correctly discriminated stimuli irrespective of their category, participants were divided into two groups showing privileged processing in either left (N = 9) or right (N = 9) visual field. In Experiment 1, only individuals with RVF advantage showed significantly faster categorization of tools in their dominant visual field, whereas those with LVF advantage revealed merely a trend toward such an effect. In Experiment 2, when targets were preceded by identical primes, the "atypical" group showed significantly facilitated categorization of non-tools, whereas the "typical" group demonstrated a trend toward faster categorization of tools. These results indicate that in subjects with atypically organized cognitive skills, tool-related processes are not just mirror reversed. Thus, our outcomes call for particular caution in neurorehabilitation directed at left-handed individuals.

References Powered by Scopus

The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory

31119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans

1221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream

1036Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Specialization of the left supramarginal gyrus for hand-independent praxis representation is not related to hand dominance

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Planning Functional Grasps of Simple Tools Invokes the Hand-independent Praxis Representation Network: An fMRI Study

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The temporal involvement of the left supramarginal gyrus in planning functional grasps: A neuronavigated TMS study

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Michałowski, B., & Króliczak, G. (2015). Sinistrals are rarely “right”: Evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00166

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

75%

Researcher 4

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 14

67%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

14%

Neuroscience 2

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0