Pocket closure after repeated subgingival instrumentation: a stress test to the EFP guideline for stage III-IV periodontitis

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To study the effects of one or two repeated subgingival instrumentations (RSI) in achieving the endpoints of therapy (EoT) in open pockets [residual probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 6 mm and PPD 4–5 mm with bleeding on probing (BoP)] after steps I-II of therapy. Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients (3,552 total sites; 1,450 open pockets) with stage III-IV periodontitis received steps I-II of periodontal therapy and were re-evaluated after 4–6 weeks (T1). Residual pockets received RSI at T1 and at 3 months (T2). EoT (PPD < 4 or PPD < 6 BoP-) rate at T1, T2 and 6 months (T3) was computed. The number of needed surgeries and treatment costs were calculated. Results: At T1, 67.6% of open pockets achieved EoT. At residual PPD ≥ 6 mm at T1 (n = 172), one and two RSI resulted in 33.1% and 45.9% of EoT at T2 and T3, respectively. At residual PPD 4–5 mm with BoP at T1 (n = 298), one and two RSI resulted in 66.8% and 72.1% of EoT at T2 and T3, respectively. PPD at T1 predicted EoT after RSI in both cases, while tooth type only in residual PPD 4–5 mm BoP +. At T1, mean number of surgeries per patient and associated costs were significantly higher than after one/two RSI. Conclusions: RSI may achieve EoT in residual PPD 4–5 mm BoP + and PPD ≥ 6 mm in a considerable number of cases. Clinical relevance: These findings may support the administration of one/two cycles of RSI prior to surgical approach. Protocol registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT04826926.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrarotti, F., Baima, G., Rendinelli, M., Citterio, F., Mariani, G. M., Mussano, F., … Aimetti, M. (2023). Pocket closure after repeated subgingival instrumentation: a stress test to the EFP guideline for stage III-IV periodontitis. Clinical Oral Investigations, 27(11), 6701–6708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05279-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free