Benefits of MR-proADM-guided decision-making in the emergency department: clinical and economic evaluation in Italy, Germany, Spain, and the UK

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: In a randomized control trial mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM)-guided decision-making has been proven to safely reduce hospital admissions based on an accurate assessment of disease severity in the Emergency Department (ED). This study aimed to assess the impact of a MR-proADM-Guided Triage (MR-GT) versus standard Hospital Triage (HT) on clinical and economic outcomes in ED patients with suspected infection in Spain, Italy, Germany, and the UK, using Patient-Level Data (PLD) from two observational studies. Methods: PLD was collected from patients enrolled at a Spanish hospital during two observational studies. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hospitalization. A patient-level simulation model was subsequently developed to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of MR-GT versus HT using results from the statistical analysis and country-specific cost data from the published literature. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were carried out. Results: Four hundred seventy-three patients were enrolled in this study. MR-proADM had the strongest association with hospital admission, followed by age and National Early Warning Score (NEWS). In the simulation model, MR-GT was associated with an overall reduction in hospitalization relative to HT, equal to 22.6 percentage points (40.9 vs. 63.5%). In addition, the use of MR-GT would reduce the total hospital cost per patient presenting to the ED with suspected infection by roughly 30%, with a mean cost saving per patient of €626, €1,484, €1,154, and £1,113 in Spain, Italy, Germany, and the UK, respectively. The robustness of these findings was confirmed by sensitivity analyses. Limitations: The statistical analyses were not performed on the same population simulated in the model. Clinical input parameters were assumed to be the same for all countries. Conclusions: MR-proADM showed to be the main predictor of hospitalization. An MR-proADM decision algorithm provides cost savings in Spain, Italy, Germany, and the UK.

References Powered by Scopus

The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)

18799Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock

4698Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology and costs of sepsis in the United States-an analysis based on timing of diagnosis and severity level

482Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Utility of the medial region of pro-adrenomodulin for the detection of true bacteremia in elderly patients treated in the emergency department for suspected infection

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biomarkers in emergencies: A never-ending race?

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Porta, C., Houshmand, H., Povero, M., Pradelli, L., Monterosso, F., Pinciroli, M., … del Castillo, J. G. (2023). Benefits of MR-proADM-guided decision-making in the emergency department: clinical and economic evaluation in Italy, Germany, Spain, and the UK. Journal of Medical Economics, 26(1), 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2023.2225354

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Environmental Science 1

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0