Vitamin D-What is normal according to latest research and how should we deal with it?

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Vitamin D defi ciency is a public health concern. Mediated by classical endocrine effects, vitamin D defi ciency is causally linked with bone and calcium disorders. Non-endocrine actions of vitamin D are also widely recognised and these effects are mediated by local tissue activation of vitamin D bringing about intracrine effects in non-classical sites. Supported by large volumes of observational studies linking low circulating vitamin D with negative outcomes for many common disease states, there is growing interest that vitamin D may be central to the pathology and outcomes of many common diseases, including cardiovascular, cancer and autoimmune conditions. This article explores the quality of evidence linking vitamin D and various disease outcomes, and furthermore describes some of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of vitamin D action that may help explain some of the incongruity of data observed in observational versus interventional studies of vitamin D supplementation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gittoes, N. J. L. (2016). Vitamin D-What is normal according to latest research and how should we deal with it? Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 16(2), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-2-171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free