Vitamin D defi ciency is a public health concern. Mediated by classical endocrine effects, vitamin D defi ciency is causally linked with bone and calcium disorders. Non-endocrine actions of vitamin D are also widely recognised and these effects are mediated by local tissue activation of vitamin D bringing about intracrine effects in non-classical sites. Supported by large volumes of observational studies linking low circulating vitamin D with negative outcomes for many common disease states, there is growing interest that vitamin D may be central to the pathology and outcomes of many common diseases, including cardiovascular, cancer and autoimmune conditions. This article explores the quality of evidence linking vitamin D and various disease outcomes, and furthermore describes some of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of vitamin D action that may help explain some of the incongruity of data observed in observational versus interventional studies of vitamin D supplementation.
CITATION STYLE
Gittoes, N. J. L. (2016). Vitamin D-What is normal according to latest research and how should we deal with it? Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 16(2), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-2-171
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.