Completing incomplete revealed preference under limited attention

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper discusses how to improve the identification of the preference of a decision-maker (DM) with limited attention proposed by Masatlioglu, Nakajima and Ozbay (2012). in "Revealed Attention". Their identification method relies on choice reversals so the obtained revealed preference is often incomplete. We propose three approaches to address this problem. The first one is accommodating a model-free approach, which respects the DM's choice in making a welfare analysis, as long as it does not contradict the revealed preference of Masatlioglu etal. The second approach incorporates the DM's exogenously obtained attention/inattention information into the model of Masatlioglu etal. The third approach is to take framings that influence the DM's attention into effect for the identification.

References Powered by Scopus

The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice

11524Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revealed attention

233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

(A, f): Choice with frames

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Informational requirements of nudging

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disentangling preferences and limited attention: Random-utility models with consideration sets

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Salience and limited attention

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Masatlioglu, Y., & Nakajima, D. (2015). Completing incomplete revealed preference under limited attention. Japanese Economic Review, 66(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jere.12066

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘2100.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

43%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

29%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0