Pullout tests on the connection to an existing foundation of a steel warehouse rebuilt after the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The tests described in this paper were aimed at evaluating the tensile capacity of the anchorages connecting an automated pallet warehouse with an existing RC foundation. The warehouse is a new steel structure erected in the place of a previous warehouse collapsed due to the Emilia earthquake, but whose foundation remained undamaged. The investigated fastening consists of 10 post-installed, bonded threaded rods with diameter (d) and embedment depth (hef) of 20 and 500 mm, respectively. Neither anchor arrangement nor embedment depth (hef > 20d) was covered by current standards for fastening design. To reproduce the in-situ actual conditions of the fastening, an unconfined test configuration was used. The maximum loads achieved were more than 3 times greater than the seismic demand for the fastening. The tests highlighted the crucial role played by the reinforcing steel which was present in the foundation. Concrete-related failure mechanisms, such as the combined pullout and concrete cone failure mechanism typical of bonded anchors, were not activated. The observed crack patterns rather suggest the onset of a flexural failure mechanism of the concrete slab. This feature is confirmed by analytical calculations showing that, at the maximum loads achieved in the tests, the top reinforcement was likely to be yielded. In six preliminary unconfined tension tests on single anchors, steel rod failure was achieved, associated with limited cracking of the concrete surface in proximity of the anchor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Minghini, F., Lippi, F., Tullini, N., & Salvatore, W. (2021). Pullout tests on the connection to an existing foundation of a steel warehouse rebuilt after the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(11), 4369–4405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01127-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free