Measuring errors and adverse events in health care

338Citations
Citations of this article
358Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we identify 8 methods used to measure errors and adverse events in health care and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. We focus on the reliability and validity of each, as well as the ability to detect latent errors (or system errors) versus active errors and adverse events. We propose a general framework to help health care providers, researchers, and administrators choose the most appropriate methods to meet their patient safety measurement goals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, E. J., & Petersen, L. A. (2003). Measuring errors and adverse events in health care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20147.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free