Problematic Positions and Speculative Play

  • Jansen P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

His basic idea was to accumulate various statistics about the search(like the number of fail-highs or fail-lows in an alpha-beta search) in order to extractsome meta-information about how the search progresses. In particular, he suggested tolook for trap and swindle positions, i.e., positions in which one of the opponent’smoveslooks much better (much worse) than its alternatives, assuming that the opponent’ssearch depth is limited. Trap positions have the potential that the opponent might makea bad move because its refutation is too deep in the search tree, while in a swindleposition the player can hope that the opponent overlooks one of his best replies becausehe does not see the crucial continuation.15 In subsequent work, Jansen (1992b, 1992a,1993) has investigated the use of heuristics that occasionally suggest suboptimal moveswith swindle potential for the weaker side of KQKR chess endgame.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jansen, P. (1990). Problematic Positions and Speculative Play. In Computers, Chess, and Cognition (pp. 169–181). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9080-0_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free