A new citation index hPI for principal investigators (PIs) is defined in analogy to Hirsch’s index h, but based on renormalized citations of a PI’s papers. To this end, the authors of a paper are divided into two groups: PIs and non-PIs. A PI is defined as an assistant, associate or full professor at a university who supervises an individual research program. The citations for each paper of a certain PI are then divided by the number of PIs among the authors of that paper. Data are presented for a sample of 48 PIs of physics and physics-related engineering departments from a private research-oriented U.S. university using the ISI Web of Science citations database. The main result is that individual rankings based on h and hPI differ substantially. Also, to a good approximation across the sample of 48 PIs, one finds that hPI=h/ where < NPI> is the average number of principal investigators for the papers of the PI in question. Similarly, hPI=12Ctot/, where Ctot is the total number of the PI’s citations. Approaches to broadending the scope of h or hPI with regard to highly cited papers are compared, and a new metric called hx is introduced for such papers which represents the average number of citations exceeding the minimum of h2 in the h-core. A recent proposal to determine an optimum h-index is also discussed in relationship to actual citation data.
CITATION STYLE
Steinbrüchel, C. (2019). A citation index for principal investigators. Scientometrics, 118(1), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2971-8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.